There is a reason why Andrew Breitbart was killed off by the deep state, he knew the real founders of the cockupy ball street movement. Which branches off into the crack lives matters movement.
At least he was able start up breitbart, his idealistic journalist website to fight the liberal media and take back the truth from a media that likes to divide and conquer. Trump calls liberal media outlets like CNN or NBC fake news.
A Underworld Market For Royal Blood?
It is possible that some drug dealer who gave me there private drug supply put not only adrenochrome in that cocktail of LSD and MDMA over these past four years but maybe somebody’s highly concentrated royal blood into that mix too. I mean it’s not crazy to assume that maybe there is some kind of underworld market for royal blood that gives people a connection to the royal family in some metaphysical and etherical way. Anything is possible in the world today because I know for damn sure that I have no royalty in my family both on my mother’s and father’s side of the family. That somebody has played a very dangerous game against me to either blackmail me, worse depopulate me or members of my own family under some kind of strange circumstance because lot’s things at this point are not adding up here.
It never occurred it to me that illegal, independent and resilient gang made or what should be better described as union made NGO supported Mindwar technology that I identify as Mindware. Probably uses radio modems that are harder to acquire off the white market, but can be easily purchased off the gray and black markets. Means that there is a possibility that these Mindware networks made by the groups above to torment common citizens and the government from that tormenting of the human mind with these electronic weapons. Could use things like radio modems, like common wireless IoT devices like wireless routers and cellular devices like 4G/LTE routers or GPRS mods. That connect to these Arduino uno and nano boards which serves three purposes in one WiFi hacking, voice to skull and directed energy applications on the human body.
****Please Don’t Use This Information Maliciously Against Another Individual and Please Be Mindful Of Federal, State, Provincial, Municipal, County and Local Laws Because You Could Be Held Criminally Liable If You Get Caught Doing This To Which I Take No Responsibility For Because You Chose To Act Maliciously Against Another Individual****
Memes are ideas, behaviors, or styles that spreads from person to person within a culture often with the aim of conveying a particular phenomenon, theme, or meaning represented by the meme. A meme acts as a unit for carrying cultural ideas, symbols, or practices, that can be transmitted from one mind to another through writing, speech, gestures, rituals, or other imitable phenomena with a mimicked theme. Supporters of the concept regard memes as cultural analogues to genes in that they self-replicate, mutate, and respond to selective pressures.
Proponents theorize that memes are a viral phenomenon that may evolve by natural selection in a manner analogous to that of biological evolution. Memes do this through the processes of variation, mutation, competition, and inheritance, each of which influences a meme’s reproductive success. Memes spread through the behavior that they generate in their hosts. Memes that propagate less prolifically may become extinct, while others may survive, spread, and (for better or for worse) mutate. Memes that replicate most effectively enjoy more success, and some may replicate effectively even when they prove to be detrimental to the welfare of their hosts.
A field of study called memetics arose in the 1990s to explore the concepts and transmission of memes in terms of an evolutionary model. Criticism from a variety of fronts has challenged the notion that academic study can examine memes empirically. However, developments in neuroimaging may make empirical study possible. Some commentators in the social sciences question the idea that one can meaningfully categorize culture in terms of discrete units, and are especially critical of the biological nature of the theory’s underpinnings. Others have argued that this use of the term is the result of a misunderstanding of the original proposal.